Hair relaxers are lotions or creams meant to loosen up the curl pattern for people with extremely curly hair. They are used to make it easy to straighten and manage hair. Relaxers work by penetrating the cuticle and cortex layers of the hair shaft to break the curl pattern. Despite their popularity, hair relaxers can be damaging as they may dry hair out, burn surrounding skin, lead to scalp damage, or cause hair loss. What are hair relaxer claims? In recent years, there has been growing concern about the ingredients used in hair relaxers and other beauty products. Many studies have warned about the presence of hormone-disrupting and carcinogenic (or cancer-causing) chemicals in such products, which can be linked to life-threatening diseases. One such study has drawn a potential link between the use of relaxers and the increased occurrence of uterine cancer. This is associated with the presence of phthalate metabolites used in hair-relaxing products. Due to such health risks, many law firms are investigating hair relaxer and straightening lawsuits and claims. Concerns Apart from the doubled risk of uterine cancer, especially in African-American women, several other health concerns are associated with chemical straighteners or hair relaxers. These include the risk of:

Hiring an attorney can be a significant judgment call. One often requires an attorney’s help when looking at property agreements, legal documentation, relocating, and other circumstances. Choosing the right attorney is crucial as the selection can have long-lasting and far-reaching implications for the client. However, one may often make mistakes in the selection process, which can impact the outcome of the legal situation. Therefore, one must avoid a few common pitfalls when hiring an attorney. Skimping on research Selecting attorneys without considering their specialization is one of the most common mistakes people make. It is crucial to remember that attorneys do not practice law in all legal fields, and each lawyer chooses a specific area of specialization. Appointing someone who is not specialized in the required field can prove to be detrimental to the case. Prioritizing only fees It is imperative to consider the cost of hiring an attorney. However, problems arise when individuals prioritize fees over quality. Compromising with quality to save some money can prove costly and can result in subpar representation and service. Opting for a low-cost alternative also means individuals often hire an inexperienced attorney, which can significantly impact the outcome of the process. Instead of solely focusing on the cost, it is essential to balance quality and affordability.